18 Monitoring
18.1 The monitoring of the Unitary Development Plan will be a vital part of the successful planning of the city during the plan period. It will help to determine whether the aims of the UDP are being met, how UDP policies are being implemented, whether they are being effective, whether there is a need for additional guidance or specific projects to assist with the plan’s implementation, and whether there is a need for the Plan to be altered or reviewed.
18.2 A monitoring report will be published on a regular basis, and will include amongst other things:
- an assessment of how UDP policies are being used in the development control process;
- the measurement of key indicators, as set out in this chapter;
- the monitoring of other indicators, relating both to specific policies and to the overall health of the city; and
- an assessment of the overall quality of development and the environment.
Indicators
18.3 The indicators included in this chapter are limited to those that are considered to most effectively demonstrate whether the plan is achieving its aims, as set out in the Plan Strategy (Chapter 2). The city council will undertake additional monitoring to determine the effectiveness of individual policies, focusing on qualitative as well as quantitative measures. This will be particularly important in assessing the effectiveness of the design policies in the plan.
|
Aim |
Indicator |
Target |
|
Vision |
1) Population of the city |
No target i |
|
Aim 1 |
||
| To meet the city’s housing needs | 2) Number of additional dwellings completed annually | An average of 530 dwellings per annum plus the annual average number of replacements for dwellings cleared over the plan period. |
| 3) Supply of land for housing development | Sufficient to accommodate 2,650 dwellings and the number of dwellings cleared over the plan period. | |
| 4) Average density of residential development | 40 dwellings per hectare | |
| 5) % of residential property that is vacant | Reduce to less than 3% by 2016 | |
| Aim 2 | ||
|
To maximise employment opportunities for local people |
6) Area of land developed for employment purposes | Annual development average of 11 hectares (net), maintaining current trends |
| 7) Supply of land for employment development | Sufficient to accommodate 55 hectares of development | |
| 8) Unemployment rate for the city | Level at or below the Greater Manchester average by 2011 | |
|
Aim 3 |
||
| To minimise the need to travel and develop a sustainable and integrated transport network |
9) % of new major trip generating development within 400m of a high frequency public transport service |
100% |
| 10) Loss of protected transport routes (Policy A 3 ‘Metrolink’, Policy A 9 ‘Provision of New Highways’ and Policy A 15 ‘Safeguarding Potential Transport Routes’) | None | |
| 11) Total length of cycleways | By 2012, complete the implementation of the cycle route network, as defined in the Salford City Council Local Cycling Strategy (2003). | |
|
12) The number of developments permitted subject to a travel plan. |
Increasing the proportion of developments subject to a Travel plan on a year by year basis. |
|
| Aim 4 | ||
| To improve environmental quality and community safety | 13) % of applications consistent with the Designing Out Crime supplementary planning guidance | 100% |
|
14) Number of residents satisfied with their local area as a place to live |
Increase over the lifetime of the plan |
|
| Aim 5 | ||
| To provide a comprehensive range of accessible local facilities | 15) % of new retail and leisure floorspace located within the town centres, neighbourhood centres, Salford Quays, Chapel Street, or the Regent Road Retail Warehouse Park | 85% |
| 16) % of local playing pitch standards achieved, as set out in the Greenspace Strategy | 100% by 2011 | |
| 17) Area of recreational open space per 1,000 people | At least 2.43 hectares by 2011 | |
|
18) Length of waterside with public access |
Increase on 2001 levels |
|
| Aim 6 | ||
| To protect natural and historic environmental assets | 19) Area of the city that complies with national air quality standards | Increase on 2001 levels by 2011 |
| 20) Area of Sites of Biological Importance and Sites of Special Scientific Interest | No net loss | |
| 21) Length of watercourses of good or fair quality | Increase on 2001 levels | |
| 22) Number of listed buildings or scheduled ancient monuments lost as a result of planning approvals | Zero | |
|
23) Length of the Manchester, Bolton and Bury Canal that has been restored |
Whole length through Salford by 2011 |
|
| Aim 7 | ||
| To secure sustainable resource management | 24) % of new housing development on previously developed land | 90% |
| 25) % of new non-residential development on previously developed land | 85% | |
| 26) % of land derelict in 2002 that is reclaimed | 50% by 2007 | |
| 27) Percentage of waste sent by the local authority for recycling | Above 33% by 2015 ii | |
| 28) % of mineral extractions in the Mosslands securing full restoration of the site to a high quality habitat | 100% | |
|
29) Loss of known economically viable mineral resources to development |
Zero |
|
| General | ||
|
|
30) Number of advertised departures from the statutory plan approved by the authority as a percentage of total permissions granted | Top quartile of local planning authorities |
|
31) Number of supplementary planning documents produced |
All documents listed in the Local Development Scheme, within the timescales indicated. |
|
- The Plan Strategy emphasises the high priority that is given to halting the decline of the city’s population, and working towards a population increase in the future, and the UDP sets out a number of policies and proposals in order to achieve this. Population levels will therefore be carefully monitored, but it is not considered appropriate to place a time-specific target on this.
- Also a target in the Community Plan
